The 2004 DARPA Grand Problem was a spectacular failure. The Protection Superior Analysis Initiatives Company had provided a US $1 million prize for the group that might design an autonomous floor automobile able to finishing an off-road course via typically flat, typically winding and mountainous desert terrain. As IEEE Spectrumreported on the time, it was “the motleyest assortment of autos assembled in a single place because the filming of Mad Max 2: The Street Warrior.” Not a single entrant made it throughout the end line. Some didn’t make it out of the car parking zone.
Movies of the makes an attempt are comical, though any laughter comes on the expense of the numerous engineers who spent numerous hours and tens of millions of {dollars} to get to that time.
So it’s all of the extra exceptional that within the second DARPA Grand Problem, only a 12 months and a half later, 5 autos crossed the end line. Stanley, developed by the Stanford Racing Crew, eked out a first-place win to say the $2 million purse. This modified Volkswagen Touareg [shown at top] accomplished the 212-kilometer course in 6 hours, 54 minutes. Carnegie Mellon’s Sandstorm and H1ghlander took second and third place, respectively, with occasions of seven:05 and seven:14.
Kat-5, sponsored by the Grey Insurance coverage Co. of Metairie, La., got here in fourth with a decent 7:30. The automobile was named after Hurricane Katrina, which had simply pummeled the Gulf Coast a month and a half earlier. Oshkosh Truck’s TerraMax additionally completed the circuit, though its time of 12:51 exceeded the 10-hour time restrict set by DARPA.
So how did the Grand Problem go from a complete bust to having 5 strong finishers in such a brief time period? It’s positively a testomony to what could be completed when engineers rise to a problem. However the consequence of this one race was preceded by a for much longer path of analysis, and that plus just a little little bit of luck are what in the end led to victory.
Earlier than Stanley, there was Minerva
Let’s again as much as 1998, when laptop scientist Sebastian Thrun was working at Carnegie Mellon and experimenting with a really completely different robotic: a museum tour information. For 2 weeks in the summertime, Minerva, which regarded a bit like a Dalek from “Physician Who,” navigated an exhibit on the Smithsonian Nationwide Museum of American Historical past. Its fundamental job was to roll round and dispense nuggets of details about the shows.
Minerva was a museum tour-guide robotic developed by Sebastian Thrun.
In an interview on the time, Thrun acknowledged that Minerva was there to entertain. However Minerva wasn’t only a individuals pleaser ; it was additionally a machine studying experiment. It needed to be taught the place it may safely maneuver with out taking out a customer or a priceless artifact. Customer, nonvisitor; show case, not-display case; open ground, not-open ground. It needed to react to people crossing in entrance of it in unpredictable methods. It needed to be taught to “see.”
Quick-forward 5 years: Thrun transferred to Stanford in July 2003. Impressed by the primary Grand Problem, he organized the Stanford Racing Crew with the intention of fielding a robotic automotive within the second competitors.
In an unlimited oversimplification of Stanley’s fundamental job, the autonomous robotic needed to differentiate between highway and not-road with a purpose to navigate the route efficiently. The Stanford group determined to focus its efforts on creating software program and used as a lot off-the-shelf {hardware} as they might, together with a laser to scan the rapid terrain and a easy video digicam to scan the horizon. Software program overlapped the 2 inputs, tailored to the altering highway situations on the fly, and decided a secure driving velocity. (For extra technical particulars on Stanley, try the group’s paper.) A remote-control kill change, which DARPA required on all autos, would deactivate the automotive earlier than it may grow to be a hazard. About 100,000 traces of code did that and way more.
The Stanford group hadn’t entered the 2004 Grand Problem and wasn’t anticipated to win the 2005 race. Carnegie Mellon, in the meantime, had two entries—a modified 1986 Humvee and a modified 1999 Hummer—and was the clear favourite. Within the 2004 race, CMU’s Sandstorm had gone furthest, finishing 12 km. For the second race, CMU introduced an improved Sandstorm in addition to a brand new automobile, H1ghlander.
Most of the different 2004 rivals regrouped to strive once more, and new ones entered the fray. In all, 195 groups utilized to compete within the 2005 occasion. Groups included college students, lecturers, trade consultants, and hobbyists.
After website visits within the spring, 43 groups made it to the qualifying occasion, held 27 September via 5 October on the California Speedway, in Fontana. Every automobile took 4 runs via the course, navigating via checkpoints and avoiding obstacles. A complete of 23 groups had been chosen to try the primary course throughout the Mojave Desert. Competing was a pricey endeavor—CMU’s Purple Crew spent greater than $3 million in its first 12 months—and the names of sponsors had been splashed throughout the autos just like the logos on race automobiles.
Within the early hours of 8 October, the finalists gathered for the massive race. Every group had a staggered begin time to assist keep away from congestion alongside the route. About two hours earlier than a group’s begin, DARPA gave them a CD containing roughly 3,000 GPS coordinates representing the course. As soon as the group hit go, it was palms off: The automotive needed to drive itself with none human intervention. PBS’s NOVA produced a wonderful episode on the 2004 and 2005 Grand Challenges that I extremely suggest if you wish to get a really feel for the thrill, anticipation, disappointment, and triumph.
Within the 2005 Grand Problem, Carnegie Mellon College’s H1ghlander was considered one of 5 autonomous automobiles to complete the race.Damian Dovarganes/AP
H1ghlander held the pole place, having positioned first within the qualifying rounds, adopted by Stanley and Sandstorm. H1ghlander pulled forward early and shortly had a considerable lead. That’s the place luck, or fairly the dearth of it, got here in.
About two hours into the race, H1ghlander slowed down and began rolling backward down a hill. Though it will definitely resumed shifting ahead, it by no means regained its prime velocity, even on lengthy, straight, stage sections of the course. The slower however steadier Stanley caught as much as H1ghlander on the 163-km (101.5-mile) marker, handed it, and by no means let go of the lead.
What went unsuitable with H1ghlander remained a thriller, even after intensive postrace evaluation. It wasn’t till 12 years after the race—and as soon as once more hopefully—that CMU found the issue: Urgent on a small digital filter between the engine management module and the gas injector brought about the engine to lose energy and even flip off. Crew members speculated that an accident just a few weeks earlier than the competitors had broken the filter. (To be taught extra about how CMU lastly figured this out, see Spectrum Senior Editor Evan Ackerman’s 2017 story.)
The Legacy of the DARPA Grand Problem
No matter who received the Grand Problem, many success tales got here out of the competition. A 12 months and a half after the race, Thrun had already made nice progress on adaptive cruise management and lane-keeping help, which is now available on many business autos. He then labored on Google’s Road View and its preliminary self-driving automobiles. CMU’s Purple Crew labored with NASA to develop rovers for doubtlessly exploring the moon or distant planets. Nearer to dwelling, they helped develop self-propelled harvesters for the agricultural sector.
Stanford group chief Sebastian Thrun holds a $2 million verify, the prize for successful the 2005 Grand Problem.Damian Dovarganes/AP
After all, there was additionally loads of hype, which tended to overshadow the race’s militaristic origins—keep in mind, the “D” in DARPA stands for “protection.” Again in 2000, a protection authorization invoice had stipulated that one-third of the U.S. floor fight autos be “unmanned” by 2015, and DARPA conceived of the Grand Problem to spur growth of those autonomous autos. The U.S. navy was nonetheless preventing within the Center East, and DARPA promoters believed self-driving autos would assist decrease casualties, significantly these brought on by improvised explosive units.
DARPA sponsored extra contests, such because the 2007 City Problem, by which autos navigated a simulated metropolis and suburban surroundings; the 2012 Robotics Problem for disaster-response robots; and the 2022 Subterranean Problem for—you guessed it—robots that might get round underground. Regardless of the competitions, continued navy conflicts, and hefty authorities contracts, precise advances in autonomous navy autos and robots didn’t take off to the extent desired. As of 2023, robotic floor autos made up solely 3 p.c of the worldwide armored-vehicle market.
Immediately, there are only a few totally autonomous floor autos within the U.S. navy; as an alternative, the providers have solid forward with semiautonomous, operator-assisted methods, comparable to remote-controlled drones and ship autopilots. The one Grand Problem finisher that continued to work for the U.S. navy was Oshkosh Truck, the Wisconsin-based sponsor of the TerraMax. The corporate demonstrated a palletized loading system to move cargo in unmanned autos for the U.S. Military.
A lot of the up to date reporting on the Grand Problem predicted that self-driving automobiles would take us nearer to a “Jetsons” future, with a self-driving automobile to ferry you round. However twenty years after Stanley, the rollout of civilian autonomous automobiles has been confined to particular functions, comparable to Waymo robotaxis transporting individuals round San Francisco or the GrubHub Starships struggling to ship meals throughout my campus on the College of South Carolina.
I’ll be watching to see how the know-how evolves outdoors of huge cities. Self-driving autos can be nice for lengthy distances on empty nation roads, however components of rural America nonetheless battle to get ample cellphone protection. Will small cities and the areas that encompass them have the bandwidth to accommodate autonomous autos? As a lot as I’d wish to suppose self-driving autos are practically right here, I don’t anticipate finding one underneath my carport anytime quickly.
A Story of Two Stanleys
Not lengthy after the 2005 race, Stanley was able to retire. Recalling his expertise testing Minerva on the Nationwide Museum of American Historical past, Thrun thought the museum would make a pleasant dwelling. He loaned it to the museum in 2006, and since 2008 it has resided completely within the museum’s collections, alongside different exceptional specimens in robotics and vehicles. In actual fact, it isn’t even the primary Stanley within the assortment.
Stanley now resides within the collections of the Smithsonian Establishment’s Nationwide Museum of American Historical past, which additionally homes one other Stanley—this 1910 Stanley Runabout. Behring Heart/Nationwide Museum of American Historical past/Smithsonian Establishment
That distinction belongs to a 1910 Stanley Runabout, an early steam-powered automotive launched at a time when it wasn’t but clear that the internal-combustion engine was the way in which to go. Regardless of clear drawbacks—steam engines had a nasty tendency to blow up—“Stanley steamers” had been recognized for his or her high-quality craftsmanship. Fred Marriott set the land velocity file whereas driving a Stanley in 1906. It clocked in at 205.5 kilometers per hour, which was considerably sooner than the Twenty first-century Stanley’s common velocity of 30.7 km/hr. To be truthful, Marriott’s Stanley was racing over a flat, straight course fairly than the off-road terrain navigated by Thrun’s Stanley.
Throughout the century that separates the 2 Stanleys, it’s simple to hint a story of progress. Each are clearly recognizable as four-wheeled land autos, however I think the science-fiction dreamers of the early twentieth century would have been hard-pressed to think about the suite of applied sciences that will propel a Twenty first-century self-driving automotive. What’s going to the autos of the early twenty second century be like? Will they even have 4 tires, or will they run on one thing completely new?
A part of a persevering with sequence historic artifacts that embrace the boundless potential of know-how.
An abridged model of this text seems within the February 2025 print problem as “Sluggish and Regular Wins the Race.”
From Your Website Articles
Associated Articles Across the Net
