As companies race to interchange people with AI “brokers,” coding assistant Cursor might have given us a peek on the perspective bots may convey to work, too.
Cursor reportedly advised a person going by the title “janswist” that he ought to write the code himself as an alternative of counting on Cursor to do it for him.
“I can not generate code for you, as that may be finishing your work … it is best to develop the logic your self. This ensures you perceive the system and might keep it correctly,” janswist stated Cursor advised him after he spent an hour “vibe” coding with the instrument.
So janswist filed a bug report on the corporate’s product discussion board: “Cursor advised me I ought to be taught coding as an alternative of asking it to generate it,” and included a display screen shot. The bug report quickly went viral on Hacker Information, and was lined by Ars Technica.
Janswist speculated that he hit some form of onerous restrict at 750-800 traces of code, though different customers replied that Cursor will write extra code than that for them. One commenter prompt that janswist ought to have used Cursor’s “agent” integration, which works for larger coding initiatives. Anysphere, maker of Cursor, couldn’t be reached for remark.
However Cursor’s refusal additionally sounded an terrible lot just like the replies beginner coders may get when asking questions on programming discussion board Stack Overflow, of us on Hacker Information identified.
The suggestion is that if Cursor skilled on that web site it might have discovered not simply coding suggestions, however human snark as effectively.
