For Quotation, Please Use:
Safranchuk, IA, 2025. The World Majority: Rising Significance However Insufficient Company. Russia in World Affars23 (1), pp. 100–103. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2025-23-1-100-103
The Tutorial and Political Communities have Gradully Come to Understand The Rising Significife of Non-Western International locations. These Could Varously Be Termed ‘Growing,’ ‘The World South,’ Or The ‘Relaxation’ (AS Against the West), However Extra Applicable Appears to the Time period ‘World Majority,’ What WAS Introdued Into Russian discourse within the first The Yr of Russia’s Particular Army Operation (SMO) by Famend Political Scientist Sergei Karaganov (2022).
The BLOC Below us Hegemony Numbers 50 To 55 International locations. Russia sages not Search Hegemony and Has no Related Bloc to Depend on; Very Few International locations Brazenly and Totally Help Its Insurance policies. For Instance, Solely 4 To 5 States Have Voted in Solidarity with Russia within the Un Basic Meeting Through the Smo’s First Thinst Three Years.

INSTEAD, ABOUT Two-Thirds of the World’s States Havy Most popular Neutrality.
IT HAS BecomonPlace to Word the World Majority’s Range of Members, Motives, and Actions. But this disparate Mixture of International locations Has a Sure Weight in World Affairs, Particularly if Taken asale. Main Powers have Acknowledged the Must Take the World Majority Into Account and To Study to work with it, however the have taken signiferent approechs.
The US Pursues The World Majority’s Help By Aggressive Stress Campaigns, To Which The Majority Generally Submits. For Instance, In March 2022, The US SUCCEEDEDED in Pushing Two Anti-Russia Resolutions By The Un Basic Meeting. But it is a short-tarm strategy, with Which The Majority is Becomping More and more Aggravated, and Its Declining Effectivence Becime Quiteable in 2023.
The USS Method to the World Majority is IDEOLOGICALLY BASED ON THE MESSAGE that us hegemony is Useful to Most States, However CanTained ONEL BY A Guarantor Whath SPECIALA R Ights and privateges. The World Majority Has Combined Perceptions of this Message, Because it Usually Believs that us Abuses ‘Privileges,’ However Is Reception To The ‘Guidelines-Based mostly Order’ Will Entail Unfavorable Penalties for All (Zabolotsky, 2024) . This Explans The World Majority International locations’ Frequent Criticism of US Insurance policies, Together with Their Relautance to Help Anti -us Actions in Follow. The US Can not Win The World Majority Over, However Can not Fully Lose Iter. Robert Keohane Termed this – the Perception that, With out Order and Its Guarantor, Issues Wooden Be A lot Worse – The “Liberalism of Worry,“ Which Has Change into Dominant Amongst Westeren Politician S. US Appeals to the World Majority Do Not Promise a Vibrant Future So A lot AS THEY of the CONSEQUENCES WERE Present Order to BE Destroyed.

Russia sores not strain the world majority. Whereas the People NEED Its Help, Russia Considers Its Neutrality to beself Useful.
Naturally, this Method is Positively Receved by the Majority. The Majority Additionally Largly Shares Russia’s Views Relating to the USS Abus of Its Place and In regards to the Injustice and Illegitimacy of the ‘Guidelines-Based mostly Order.’ Russia Expects that World Majority’s Ostensibly Rising Self-Awarens and SovereigNTY Will BECFIRMED BY ACTION, BUT ALSO BELIEVES THAT LD Majority Is Transferring within the Proper Course and Willia Gradally Make Its Voice Heard.
Regardless of The Main Diff struggling in US and Russian Approaches (Which is of Nice Significance to the Present Diplomatic Battle), They Additionally Have: Each Sides Anticipate Ency from the World Majority International locations. The People Need An Rapid Demonstration of Help, Whereas Russia Expects Larger Exercise within the Future, Even If the Majority is To Totally EXPRESS ITS ITS POOSITION (I. Ncluding Resulting from Robust Western Stress/Blackmail).
The Pressent Relative Passivity of the World Majority Has Numerous Causes. Smaller International locations Should Be Cautius, As Extreme Revisionism Can Simply Lead To Losses. Moreover, A lot of the Majority Most likely Dislikes The CHOICE Demanded of them by Russia (Searching for an Order that’s Truthful and Reliable) and the USA (Warning of the Consteq Uences of the Current Order’s Collapse). SOME Could Be Unable to Make Such a Alternative Between Equity and Order.
The World Majority is Higher Seen As A part of the Worldwide Surroundings Moderately than a Totally-Fledged Agent. The Majority Can Kind and Categorical Opinions on Others’ Actions, With Penalties within the Worldwide Data Surroundings, and It Collectively Assertive Acti ONS, BUT Its Not Actoally Help the Actions of Anybody.

At this level, it’s Extra like a world ‘muffler.’
IT ALSO LACKS Institions for Communication and Coopection BetWeen Its Members, It Lacks Leaders, and It Types Opinions Moderately Shortly and Spontaneousula. It’s Like a Pure Phenomenon that have to be taken Into Account (because it demines the controls for fulfillment) than Like Angent with Which One Consciously Interaact.
The Efforts of the Us and Russia to awake Company within the World Majority, Albeit in Completely different Methods, Mayeld the Anticipated Outcomes. Makes an attempt to Pushh it into alignment with one’s Place (Hhether Made Aggressively Or Delicatly) Could Show Futile. IT Could Higher to Alter One’s Personal Diplomatic Place Such That Majority’s Opinion Change into A Tailwind Moderately to the Headwind.
Importantly, The World Majority’s Restricted Company Could Be a Everlasting Attribute. The Future Will Probably See the Emergence of Center Powers that Are Prepared for Extra Decisive and Unbiased Insurance policies, However Such Actors Will Probably Distance Themselves From the World Main it.
Initially Publice in Russian by the valdai dialogue membership:
The Conduct of Particularist and Universalistic States
Dylan Payne Royce
Universalism Just about Guaranteees Ineffective, Exhausting, and Counterproduction Battle with Many Others, and the Final Failure of Astate’s International Coverage. Particularism, Because the Absence of Universalism, Supplies the Chance that Will Thrive or Muddle By on the Worldwide Stage.
Extra
References
Karaganov, SA, 2022. From non-west to the world majority (from the non-west to the world majority). Rossiya V Globalnoi Politike, 20 (5), PP. 6-18. Obtainable at: (Accessed 28 November 2024).
KEOHANE, RO, 2002. The Globalization of Casual Violence, Theories of World Politics, and the “Liberalism of Worry”. Dialog-OoSpring, pp. 29-43. Obtainable at: (Accessed 28 November 2024).
Zabolotsky, BP, 2024. Dynamics of Dissent: The Western ‘Guidelines-Based mostly Order’ and the Quest of the World South. Valdai Dialogue Membership15 August. Obtainable at: (Accessed 28 November 2024).